[00:01:23] Preston Pysh: Okay. So this first one is a personal favorite of mine. As an engineer, this clip that we’re about to play with Saylor, I think just does such a phenomenal job kind of explaining what he’s doing at MicroStrategy.

[00:01:39] Bitcoin at large, I think for maybe an outsider, they might listen to it and they’d be like, how does this relate to Bitcoin? And hopefully Joe and I can maybe talk through some of that after the clip plays. Did you have any other commentary before we let this one run?

[00:01:51] Joe Burnett: Yeah, no, this is definitely one of my favorite clips that I think I’ve heard Saylor say. And I feel like the question was framed somewhat as like a gotcha question. And I think Saylor does like a great job of dismantling that and then explaining his reasoning. So I thought it was a great clip.

[00:02:06] Preston Pysh: All right, let’s do it. And I’m putting up on the screen and we’re going to go ahead and let this baby play.

[00:02:11] Anthony Pompliano: But I think where people trip up with your language is this idea of the inevitability of the 60%.

[00:02:18] What would you say to that?

[00:02:20] Michael Saylor: So we’re dealing with three concepts, risk, volatility, and performance. Okay. So I’ve addressed the risk issue by pointing out that there is existential risk and you’re given network or frame of reference. And I just want to make that point that once you understand that risk of being in that frame of reference, then you have to figure out what’s the source of the volatility and the performance. And if you don’t understand why the asset does what it does, if you don’t understand the economic physics involved, then you’ll think it’s random and you’ll feel like the performance is risky.

[00:02:57] But I want to give you an example of a physical metaphor. I’m a hiker and I come across a mountain lake. And the mountain lake has 500 trillion gallons of water in it. And yeah, I don’t know how it got there, but it’s there. The water’s chilly. It’s clear. And I look down and there’s a waterfall coming off the mountain lake.

[00:03:19] And the waterfall is very beautiful, and it’s very turbulent, right? Water is turbulent in a waterfall. Water is not turbulent in a glassy lake. So, the turbulence is volatility, and there’s waterfall, and then I look at it, and now if you look and you say, I don’t know why that water falls downhill. I don’t know if it’ll keep falling downhill.

[00:03:40] But I hate the volatility. Then I guess you can take a selfie in front of the lake, go swimming, get cold, and leave. But if, let’s say you’re not a tourist, but you’re an engineer. So you come across the same lake, and you see the waterfall, and you see the 500 trillion gallons, and you think about gravity, and you think about sunlight.

[00:03:59] And now I know how the water got there. The water got there because the sun shone on the ocean, the water evaporated from the ocean, it rose up in the clouds, the wind blew it against the mountain, it condensed and it rained into the mountain, and the water ran off the mountain into the mountain lake.

[00:04:15] I know how it got there and then I think, well, if I create a dam near that waterfall, I build myself a dam, I put a turbine on the dam. And then I drop a billion gallons of water, I channel a billion gallons of water through the dam, drop it 60 feet. And then I plug that into a hydroelectric power plant, I spin the dynamo, I make electricity. And then if I’m really smart, I run the electric power line to a village down in the valley, I light up the village or I light up the city.

[00:04:43] Now, someone can come along that doesn’t understand physics and they can say, Good idea, Junior, but what are you going to do when the water stops flowing downhill?

[00:04:53] Well, I’m like, well, I actually think the water’s flowing downhill because of gravity. Newton solved that for me. And then someone else comes along and says, good idea, junior, but what are you going to do when you run out of water in the lake? Well, there’s 500 trillion gallons and I take out my calculator and a billion gallons or whatever, it’s going to last a long time.

[00:05:12] Like, well, it’s eventually going to run out. I say. Well, the sun keeps shining on the ocean, and the ocean keeps lifting the, the water out of the ocean, and it drops it on this mountain, and that’s why there’s water in the mountain. But you’re right, there’s some kind of natural limit, and I suppose there’s a limit to the amount of energy I can pull off of this dam, but it’s a large number, it’s a lot more than your donkey cart.

[00:05:37] And it’s a lot more than your steam wood stove, and it’s a lot more than your coal power plant. And maybe it’s a lot cleaner than burning gasoline. So, I’m an engineer, and you’re seeing performance thinking it’s random, and that’s why it’s going to stop. And you’re seeing volatility, and you’re thinking it’s random, and maybe it’ll stop.

[00:05:58] And here with Bitcoin, the reason Bitcoin’s performing is, A, it’s volatile, but B, it’s a more energy efficient state. The water is flowing down 5, 000 feet because it’s a lower energy state 1, 000 feet below the mountain. It’s a lower energy state. You’ve got potential energy in the water and it wants to go to ground and that’s just physics.

[00:06:21] The 500 trillion gallons of water is 500 trillion dollars. And the 500 trillion dollars of assets are sitting in real estate and currency and sovereign bonds and corporate bonds and artwork. And equity and con, they’re sit, they’re invested in the stock of a company in Africa that’s going bankrupt. Right?

[00:06:44] There’s in, they’re invested in real estate in Cuba, in Venezuela, in Nigeria. They’re sitting in a warehouse that’s crumbling. It’s got a 40 year life. And so entropy and inflation, you invested a hundred billion dollars in a war zone, and then a war broke out, your asset got devalued all of the things going on in the world, the war, the chaos, the competition, the inflation, the entropy, the passage of time, the hurricane, the COVID, vaccine, the COVID virus, all of these things impaired the value of your assets.

[00:07:22] The reason Bitcoin is going up, it’s not an accident, it’s because capital is economic mass. It is flowing from a high energy state, the mountaintop, to a lower energy state, to a more efficient state. It is steam condensing to water, condensing to ice, giving off energy, just like in any chemistry lab you would learn this.

[00:07:45] Preston Pysh: All right. So this is one of my favorite clips because there is so much going on in this. This clip came from Impact Theory. Joe, do you know his name who does that over? He does a really good job.

[00:07:57] Joe Burnett: Yeah. Tom Bello, Bale, something like that. Yeah.

[00:08:00] Preston Pysh: And we’re going to have a link to in the show notes to all these clips that we’re playing so that you can go and watch the entire interview or the original source, video, but good Lord. Go ahead and take it away on your recap. And then I’ll share, I guess, some of my thoughts as well, but go ahead, Joe.

[00:08:15] Joe Burnett: Yeah, absolutely. Like you said, this is one of my favorite Saylor clips of all time. Like, I really loved this analogy of assets wanting to move from high potential energy state, the lower potential energy state. And I’ve never articulated it in that way, but that’s kind of how I’ve thought about Bitcoin for a while in the sense that like.

[00:08:34] If humanity stores 20 trillion worth of wealth in gold, then there’s a market incentive or a bounty for entrepreneurs, miners, businesses, governments to go out there and mine more gold and dilute gold and sell it on the open market at the market price.

[00:08:50] Same with real estate, 300 trillion worth of wealth in real estate. It’s like, that’s a bounty and a market incentive to go out there and build more houses and apartment buildings. So it’s like, Bitcoin is this lower potential energy state where no matter how much time, energy, or resources are poured into trying to create more Bitcoin, there’s only ever going to be 21 million Bitcoin.

[00:09:09] So I feel like it aligns really well with like the scarcity of Bitcoin. And it just shows that capital naturally wants to flow out of these older traditional assets and potentially into Bitcoin.

[00:09:22] Preston Pysh: He did this presentation to Microsoft and in the presentation, he said, here’s if you add up the value of everything on the planet today, it’s about 900 trillion for all of it.

[00:09:34] And then what he says is that if you take that 900 trillion, it’s split into two categories. People are storing things for store value purposes, and then people are valuing it based off of utility. And what he’s saying is that today, before Bitcoin’s minuscule right now compared to these valuations of everything, but his opinion is, is that call it half of that 900 trillion is made up of people that are pushing it into something that’s just for store of value purposes, call it real estate.

[00:10:03] People owning three to five homes in the Hamptons because it’s a desirable location. They don’t need all those homes, but they need to store and freeze that value that they earned or the profits that they earn. They need to store it into something and they’re choosing to do it through real estate because it’s preserved its buying power better than other assets.

[00:10:23] So what he’s saying in this presentation to Microsoft is that. If half of people are choosing to store their buying power in something for store of value purposes, his opinion is a lower energy state or something that is getting debased at a way lower pace than, we’ll call it real estate because you’re paying real estate taxes, you’re paying to keep the building sustained, like all of these things are frictional costs in order to try to preserve your buying power in these types of things.

[00:10:54] He’s saying Bitcoin, there’s like near zero, like the energy state is so low compared to these other things that his opinion is that a lot of that buying power and we could pull up the slides, but he suggests an enormous amount of that buying power to the tune of hundreds of trillions of dollars of that buying power is going to shift and move into Bitcoin.

[00:11:14] And it was just so well articulated in a visual kind of way in that video clip. And there’s a lot more going on there than what I just, throughout, but definitely something for people to think about and use as a visual. And I love this other undertone. Sorry to keep going on, Joe, but the other thing that I, that I really like about what he’s talking about is he’s also putting on display.

[00:11:37] If you don’t understand other complex topics. It’s going to be very hard for you to see or understand this much bigger thing that’s been pieced together. So he does this through, like, well, how did the water get in the lake? And it’s like, well, you have to understand how evaporation works, and that it’s a function of the sunlight hitting the earth.

[00:11:58] And if you’re a person who’s just walking up and you don’t understand these concepts, you’re going to look at all the water in the lake and you’re going to say, oh, well, that’s going to become depleted and then that’s not worth your time. And that was just like one example of many that are in there. And I would argue for a person to truly understand Bitcoin and how like all this buying power is flowing into Bitcoin and how the flow of funds are going to continue to persist.

[00:12:23] There’s a lot of different complex. macro topics that you really have to deeply understand to understand how this is going to continue to flow into it. And so he does that so well in that example. And yeah, I just love that clip. That clip’s awesome.

[00:12:40] Joe Burnett: Yeah. I’ll add one more thing Preston I thought was really interesting. Like the waterfall analogy in particular is so fascinating and in the sense of like A waterfall is very volatile and scary. And I feel like a lot of people are like looking at Bitcoin. They’re staring at the waterfall right in front of them. And that’s all they see is what’s been happening over the last couple months or even the last 12 months.

[00:13:01] Whereas in reality, it’s like you got to zoom out and see the big picture of the water evaporating into the lake and then the lake blowing through the waterfall down into Bitcoin. That’s exactly kind of what’s happening is most people are just stuck looking at the waterfall right here. And they just see the volatility and the short termness and reality. They got to zoom out and see the really big picture.

[00:13:23] Preston Pysh: Yeah, totally.

[00:13:25] All right. So this next clip is Trace Mayer, which we’re going to play. And for people that maybe are newer to the space, they might not know who trace is. He is an OG in the Bitcoin space. I have a bit of a confession. This guy had an enormous part in orange pilling me, a decade ago, whenever I was watching videos of him talking about network effects and whatnot.

[00:13:49] And yeah, so let’s go ahead and play this clip and then let’s see what we’ve got as far as commentary afterwards, Joe.

[00:13:57] Trace Mayer: When we look through the long corridors of human history, from our journey from the swamps to the stars, we’ve had these innovations that come about from brilliant minds, the coining of gold and silver thousands of years ago, Nicholas Copernicus with heliocentric theory and the quantity theory of money.

[00:14:16] Isaac Newton coming up with the gold standard itself that laid a foundation for peace and prosperity and world trade on a massive scale. The brightest mind ever in human history, Johan van Goethe, a 215 IQ, 30 points higher than Isaac Newton’s. He wrote in Faust about all the negative effects that come to society when the government or the state takes control of the monetary unit.

[00:14:45] And at the end of the day, gold and silver, and I would put Bitcoin, they’re not just mere commodities, but they’re essential checks and balances in the political machinery. They stand in the same place as constitutions and bills of right. This isn’t about money, or merely making money. It’s about whether individuals will make their choices, or whether monetary elites will make the choices for them.

[00:15:13] It’s going to be, in my opinion, a very bright future, because if we really want to change things, we have to change the economics. And through all of human history, if we look at the economics of violence, it’s been very profitable to engage in violent activity. Conquering a neighboring tribe, stealing their crops, taking their land, the industrial age, we needed force to be projected on a massive scale to protect our railroads, the holders of capital could easily be extorted, the coal mine, by taxes, by organized labor, but as we move into the information age, Diffie and Hellman came up with asymmetric cryptography, public key, private key encryption.

[00:15:57] Which is a vital component of Bitcoin itself. And some of the original cypherpunks realized the economic implications of this asymmetric cryptography. Because the laws of the universe, they bless nuclear power and nuclear weapons. But they also bless the laws of mathematics and this asymmetric cryptography.

[00:16:20] And at the end of the day, no amount of violence will solve a math problem. You cannot direct a nuclear bomb at a math problem and solve it. That is just not how math works, period. And with asymmetric cryptography, it has changed the economics of violence. This is a tectonic layer for guiding human action and human behavior, because now the cost of protection has rapidly plummeted and become free in a lot of cases, and yet the return on investment from attempting to extort, it’s just not possible.

[00:16:57] I mean, you can tax the coal mine. And you can, organize labor, but like with the information age assets, they’re increasingly fleeing into these areas where they can secure protection behind cryptography. And that’s a big deal, because now, holders of capital, whether it’s the ultra rich Or whether it’s someone in the developing world, they can now secure protection for their money, basically for free, using open source software.

[00:17:28] And that’s a huge, huge deal. Because our freedom is directly proportional to the amount of protection that we’re able to secure for ourselves. And this is a huge force multiplying technology that we’re able to use to secure that freedom. And at the end of the day, it changes the economics of violence.

[00:17:48] And it makes violence not very profitable anymore. In fact, it makes violence a wealth destroying activity. And that I think will change the underlying tectonic plates that all of our human action is based on and will lead to a much more peaceful world, a world where property rights are defined and protected by mathematical code, regardless of what centralized third parties want to do.

[00:18:16] Even if those third parties control violence on an enormous scale, that violence will be impotent against the math. What a clip. All right, go ahead, Joe.

[00:18:27] Joe Burnett: Yeah, I agree with what you said at the start. Like, Grace Mayer was a key figure in my role in helping understand Bitcoin. Him, Pierre Richard, who’s now VP of Research at Riot Platforms, Bittstein.

[00:18:38] So yeah, this was a very interesting clip. And I think new people that might be getting into Bitcoin because the number is going up. the price is going up, it kind of enables you to take a step back and like, realize how powerful the tool cryptography and Bitcoin is to begin with, if we’re right about Bitcoin, which I think we are, then it has a lot more implications than just you potentially making a lot of money, it could change the world.

[00:19:02] For the better, like it could prevent or make it more difficult for governments to finance or print money to fund endless wars or whatever else. So it’s a pretty incredible technology beyond just becoming more wealthy.

[00:19:16] Preston Pysh: So this is probably the number one passion point I have in Bitcoin is what he was talking about there. And it’s mostly because of my background. I spent two years in a combat zone in military service, and I just saw how insanely corrupted that entire process is. And at the core of it is you can go to war with somebody else. And citizens, for the most part, that represent that body, that military body that aren’t serving, they’re not taxed up front, right?

[00:19:49] They’re taxed through the depreciation and the debasement of the currency. And so they’re paying the bill for the next 10, 20 years or whatever through the inflation of the currency. And for them, it’s kind of like, ah, well, no big deal. But when you start going to a hard money where you just can’t print more of it, or else your country can’t possibly compete when there’s this decentralized money that no government can control, all of a sudden the incentives in the game theory on violence itself completely changes.

[00:20:19] And as somebody that was on the end of that and had to deal with the repercussions of all of this art, I can tell you, this is hands down the most passionate thing in Bitcoin that I have. So, love that clip from Trace, he does such a phenomenal job explaining that in detail. All right. Let’s go to this next one.

[00:20:38] This is a really good clip. And this is, Nik Bhatia talking with Marty Bent with the TFTC podcast. And again, we’ll have links to all of these in full detail if you want to watch them in long form in the show notes. But Joe, anything else you have for this next one for the setup or just jump to the play?

[00:20:58] Joe Burnett: Let’s jump into it.

[00:20:59] Preston Pysh: Okay, here we go.

[00:21:00] Nik Bhatia: And I realized that something else was happening and Michael Saylor is not selling. assets to buy Bitcoin. Not only is he not selling assets to buy Bitcoin, his investors that are buying his convertible bonds are not necessarily selling other assets to buy those bonds.

[00:21:19] How? Because if you’re a bond investor, and I worked at two bond shops, one of them had about 4 billion under management, the other had over 100 billion under management. At the 100 billion firm, I personally was responsible for the execution trading of about 20 billion of those securities. So we had a lot of treasuries, and those were all in my book.

[00:21:40] I didn’t make all the decisions, I made some of them, but I was in charge of trading. So I had to know everything about the market. As I was trading these bonds, Some of my treasuries that were on my book, the credit guys would say, Hey, sell five year treasuries. I need to buy this five year Apple bond and I need cash.

[00:22:01] So I said, okay, so I sell my treasuries. He buys the Apple bond and in a couple of days, the money comes in from my sale and it goes out to Apple. And Apple gets the money. And where did it come from? It came from an existing pile of money that in which I owned U. S. Treasuries. But, what if I shouted back to Rob, Hey Rob, I don’t have any fives.

[00:22:24] You’re just gonna have to buy it. I’ll sell treasury futures on the other side so you don’t take on double duration, right, because each bond has duration risk. So, I’ll sell treasury futures. You buy the Apple bond. You don’t have risk, but Then Rob says, well, how am I going to finance it? Where’s the money?

[00:22:41] And I tell Rob, call Morgan Stanley and ask them to finance your bond. So he calls Morgan Stanley and Morgan Stanley says, we’ll lend you 80 percent of the money or 70 percent of the money. SOFR plus 50 basis points and Rob looks at the screen and he says, okay, done. So now Morgan Stanley has just created 70 percent of the new purchase from ThinAir.

[00:23:05] Now where does Morgan Stanley get the money? Well, Morgan Stanley repo desk writes that, underwrites that collateralized loan because they’ve taken the micro strategy bond as collateral. They’ve issued money. Where do they get the money? It’s basically the daisy chain of. Banking liabilities from their parent bank and their parent bank doesn’t necessarily have to mark that extension of the balance sheet until month end, but their desks are managing how much liability expansion is happening.

[00:23:35] And then at the end of the month, they try to true it up to make sure that it looks good for the books, the window dressing that we hear about. And at the end of the month, they have expanded their balance sheet by X amount and some of that X, a proportion of it, is due to an expansion of repo financing.

[00:23:53] Therefore, my entire point about this next wave of Bitcoin price increase is that it is due not 100 percent to a rotation. This was the big word that we would all use for years. The bond market is 100 trillion, guys. Some of that money is going to get into Bitcoin. But you’re assuming that they’re going to sell the bonds.

[00:24:16] But that’s not how these bond managers do things. Yes, they sell some bonds to buy new bonds, but bond funds finance positions with repo. They borrow money to buy new bonds, and that’s how they leverage. So they’re over 100 percent in their AUM in securities holdings. And if you have 150 percent long bonds, That means you have a negative 50 percent role.

[00:24:44] It’s a financing role. It’s a borrow. The 50 percent over a hundred comes from the borrow. And that borrow doesn’t come from somebody else’s borrow. It comes from credit extension. Go back to your basics on how a bank extends a loan. Balance sheet A is 100 assets and 100 liabilities. And balance sheet B next month or next day is 200 and 200.

[00:25:10] Because there’s a new 100 loan and new 100 deposits. That is an expansion of the monetary system, the financial system. And my whole thesis here is that Bitcoin getting to 20 trillion. It’s not going to happen because there’s several trillion of bonds being sold and then buying Bitcoin or bonds being sold and giving it to Saylor so that he can buy Bitcoin.

[00:25:34] It’s going to be people basically just call it a new company. A new company with a lot of cash flow. So a lot of credit worthiness. Let’s just say NVIDIA, NVIDIA goes to their, let’s just say they go to the capital market and say, we want Bitcoin as a strategic reserve. Now we want it as a corporate balance sheet item.

[00:25:56] And NVIDIA says, by the way, this 20 billion that we have in cash on our balance sheet, just make up the number. We’re not going to use any of that. We don’t want to use our cash. And so the market says, well, how about you issue a bond and NVIDIA says, great idea because the carry meaning the interest expense will be 5 percent and our expected Bitcoin return will be 30 percent per annum.

[00:26:22] And so that is. Return on investment invested capital that we embrace. So, let’s make that decision. It goes to the market. It issues bonds. The market buys the bonds, finances them through additional repo financing. If you don’t want to think about repo, just think of it as credit. It’s just a credit line.

[00:26:42] So, investors say, hey, can I have a credit line? They go to Citi and they say, hey, Nvidia just issued some new bonds. I want to buy them. Will you lend me money? And Citi says, okay, here’s a new loan for 100, 000, 000. The bond fund takes the 100, 000, 000 and buys NVIDIA bonds. There’s no repo there. Just another random bank that lent you money.

[00:27:03] Now you have a loan to Citi. You have to pay interest expense on that. You have a long asset Bitcoin. And the long asset Bitcoin is 100 percent leverage because you borrowed the money from Citi. And is Citi’s balance sheet larger today than it was yesterday? Yes. So where did the money come from for new Bitcoin demand? It came from thin air.

[00:27:22] Preston Pysh: All right. So Joe, there’s a lot going on here and I want to pick this apart in gory detail. So go ahead and take it away first and then I’ll throw in my comments.

[00:27:31] Joe Burnett: Yeah, absolutely. I mean, Nick has a really good insight here that he really in particular has because he worked at bond shops and he knows obviously how the deep financial plumbing of the global financial system actually works.

[00:27:44] And like I had, I guess two Key takeaways from this one is like the idea of we and the Bitcoin community, including myself, talk about the rotation of other assets into Bitcoin, and that not even necessarily required for Bitcoin to go up substantially. And it’s because of this new credit creation process that happens through the banking system, as Nick explained, that New dollars that are being used to buy Bitcoin and this example, he’s talking about micro strategies, convertible bonds.

[00:28:16] They’re not necessarily coming from another asset class or another bond or whatever else. It’s coming from credit that’s being created directly from the banking system itself. And it’s being lent out of thin air, which is exactly kind of how the banking system works. And so I thought it was a fantastic clip and it made me like, really kind of be like, okay, wow, like this bull market, if corporates actually go about issuing many, many convertible notes and buying Bitcoin could be pretty extreme.

[00:28:46] Preston Pysh: One of the comments that he said is not going to be the market selling off. It’s going to be what was the exact verbiage or the way he said it. I just want to put some context on this. So what you’re seeing is the duration collapse. So if you look at sovereigns 10 years ago, you could issue a 30 year bond.

[00:29:04] The last year and a half Janet Yellen has funded the government completely out of short duration note issuance. And the reason why that you’re seeing this collapse of duration on all sovereign issuance is because nobody will buy anything with a lot of duration because of the fear of inflation impacting a bond.

[00:29:24] For people that, that don’t understand if you buy a 30 year bond and it’s only yielding a 2 percent coupon and you experience 5 percent inflation over that 30 years, your net negative 3 percent buying power loss over each one of those years are compounded. And so the, the real impact is massive. And let me tell you, if the market thinks that the inflation is going to be 5 percent and you’re selling it at just in that example that I used at 2%, that bond is going to be impacted on the price massively for anything with a lot of duration.

[00:30:00] So what they’ve had to do is they’ve had to go out and only issue three month money or six month money because they know that if they sold something that was 30 years in duration, it would be immediately a massive discount, even as they’re selling it into the market, let alone how it would perform afterwards.

[00:30:17] And so Nick’s point. That they have to roll it, what he’s getting at there is as this continues to unfold from a fiscal standpoint, the way that the governments are going to handle it is they just have to issue short duration money. Then, if the market’s really concerned about the inflation and the government’s inability to control their spending, the yields on, on that short duration money are going to keep going up.

[00:30:41] So we talk a lot about tether making, they made over 10 billion last year by just holding short duration treasuries because these short duration treasuries are yielding so much on the coupon. And so think about the impact here. So they’ve already lost all of the duration that they can issue. And now they have to start flirting with the idea of, do we have to issue it at an even higher coupon rate with no duration?

[00:31:08] And that’s where this printing and that’s where a lot of this is unfolding. And he’s exactly right. That as these other bonds are either being bought back out of the market and then issued at short duration, or, and this is at a corporate level and even a sovereign level, what the impact that you’re going to see in the printing is it’s all going to be short duration.

[00:31:27] And they’re going to struggle to keep the yields at bay if they can’t get the fiscal out of control spending under control. Now, I think it’s very interesting right now with Doge and what’s happening in the U. S. Like, what does that mean from a bond issuance standpoint out of the treasury? Can they start bringing interest rates down if they start getting their fiscal spending under control?

[00:31:53] I forget what the, what the deficit was just this past year. I want to say it was close to like 2 trillion. And when we say that, that’s how much more they spent than what they brought in through tax receipts and basically the top line of the government. And so let’s say they can bring that, let’s say that they could just take all of that out.

[00:32:10] Which is where the printing is really coming from is that deficit is really kind of what they have to paper over an issue with short duration notes. My comeback to that would be because a bitcoiner would say, okay, well, if they can get that under control, well, then the printing’s not going to be there and the dollar is going to get stronger and all these other things.

[00:32:27] There’s two comebacks that I have to kind of that talking point. First of all, the system itself is dependent on M2 expansion for real estate prices, for stock market valuations, like all of that, that expanding M2 liquidity is part of that top line. If you want to see just horrific Tax receipts on any given year, they’re almost completely correlated to poor performance in equity markets.

[00:32:58] And then Luke Roman talks about this all the time. If you want to see the government really have a massive deficit, look when the equity markets underperformed. And when did the equity markets underperform? When there wasn’t enough liquidity being provided into the economy and they were trying to pull things back.

[00:33:13] So that continued expansion of call it 8 percent on M2. I think is a core function of a fiat system at large. Okay. The other point that I would make is just because the U. S. is getting their deficit down through call it government efficiency. Let’s just say they’re successful and they are able to drop it a trillion or two in the coming year or two.

[00:33:34] That doesn’t mean that every other country on the planet. Is now all of a sudden becoming efficient, like the U. S. is, right? And last time I checked, all these other governments are a huge input of the amount of fiat being added into the system. Okay? So if the dollar gets too strong relative to all these other currencies because they’re being fiscally, all of a sudden they’re being fiscally responsible because of Elon Musk’s doge, which I think is a huge if, okay?

[00:34:02] The dollar can’t accelerate in a way versus all these other currencies, which is exactly what would happen. They would have to devalue the dollar in order to make the system function and not have sheer chaos. So there is a lot going on in that clip. I love how Nick lays it out. He’s exactly right. I just wish he would have, and it’s hard to cover all because there’s so much going, this stuff is so complex, but.

[00:34:26] In my opinion, the duration is really important. And then the interest rate on top of that, nothing duration that’s going to be issued is really kind of how a lot of this flow of additional printing is going to manifest itself into the economy. Any other points that you have Joe on that one? Sorry, I went on so long, but that’s a really, really important clip and Nick did an amazing job talking it.

[00:34:48] Joe Burnett: Yeah, no, that was great. And I completely agree. It’s gonna be really interesting to see how successful Doge is. Like we’ve seen them saving millions and even billions of dollars. And it kind of shows like how massive the government really is for them to be saving billions of dollars and still not really making much of a dent quite yet.

[00:35:06] But I agree, like if they actually did make a dent and were able to successfully balance the budget, I can imagine markets would probably Walter and then, the sovereign wealth fund would be buying all of the assets and buying probably a lot of Bitcoin. So it’ll be interesting to see how it plays out.

[00:35:21] Preston Pysh: At the end of the day, if there’s trillions of less units in the system, that is going to impact the price of everything.

[00:35:30] Now, some assets are going to be impacted more than others as far as the price moves. But if there’s a hundred trillion units in the system and you remove 25 trillion of them, it’s just as like an example, if it’s decreased by 25%, now all of a sudden everything has to be repriced with less units in the system.

[00:35:47] The dollar is going to bid, it’s going to get really strong in that scenario. And so that’s really bad for tax receipts, because if people didn’t make money for the year in the stock market and how they’re holding all their assets, all of a sudden the top line that’s then flowing back to the government impacted, and that has to be offset somehow.

[00:36:04] So there’s, it’s this ongoing, and I would love to have a lot of conversation around this idea. And so people listening to this in the comments, whatever that I think this is a really important thing to discuss, but those are some of the key variables that I think are important to kind of think about. As you’re going through this fiscal deficit reduction, I think that there’s some very naive takes on how important just basic liquidity in the expansion of liquidity is when you’re operating in a fractional reserve fiat based system.

[00:36:36] All right, let’s go ahead and go to the next clip. And just so people know this is Tad Smith. I had him on my show. He’s an expert in art. He was the, the CEO of Sotheby’s and just an amazing thought leader in the space here.

[00:36:51] Tad Smith: I didn’t realize that if the average year, the money printer goes, call it 8 to 10%. Even in the Western countries, even in the OECD nations, and the average return on the S& P 500 is, call it, 9 ish percent, including dividends, maybe 9. 7, maybe a little less, that it means that all of the work of the S& P 500 All of the value created there is actually the money printer. That to me was startling.

[00:37:20] I mean, to think about that, the fundamental notion that in a closed system or even an open system, when you’re printing money at the rate of 8 to 10 percent a year, everything is losing value and the things that appear to be gaining value are not gaining value. They’re just keeping you even. So you can put all your money in the S& P 500 and you’re not gaining any relative wealth at all.

[00:37:41] That’s a startling insight. I mean, when you really think about the entire value of the S& P 500 on average over a long period of time, not even a long period of time, is equivalent to the money printer. That’s to me a shock. And it was a shock that said, Oh my goodness, how do you think about creating wealth that is relatively greater in this economy?

[00:38:01] And you have to look hard. The other thing you can imagine is I could tell you about sharp ratios and diversification. I could tell you all these different things and it’s interesting. You can take a concept like diversification of risk and at a top level, it can be very powerful and useful tool.

[00:38:17] But if you are so focused on the mechanistic aspect of that, you can step back and miss the forest, which is in a highly diversified portfolio. It’s unbelievably hard to pick up relative amounts of wealth. It is. Diversifying your portfolio, however you do it, is by and large going to reduce your incremental gain in wealth, irrespective of the Sharpe ratio.

[00:38:41] It’s concentration of capital in specific bets that outperform the money printer where you actually create wealth. That was a shock to me. I just didn’t get it. I didn’t understand it. Even though I taught finance for 20 plus years. I’m still a professor at NYU Stern at Stern Business School. I’ve taught strategy and finance for technology media entertainment companies.

[00:39:01] I’m on a two year hiatus, but I’ll be presumably going back in the spring for 25 years. I have almost actually more than 1000 former students and I still didn’t get it until I’m age 58. That’s the Bitcoin journey.

[00:39:13] Preston Pysh: What a zinger, right? Like, holy moly. What’s your take on this one, Joe?

[00:39:18] Joe Burnett: Yeah, I think Tad is like one of the best voices in the Bitcoin space.

[00:39:23] I mean, teaching at Stern Business School, one of the top business schools in the world for 20 years, kind of making the key point of why you should hold and save Bitcoin is really cool to see him and doing that. I think he made like two pretty key points in that video.

[00:39:38] One is The S& P 500 just keeps up with the money printer. And I think a lot of people kind of intuitively already know this. You’re a typical investor ignoring Bitcoin. You’re saving effectively saving in assets like SPY or BOO S& P 500 index funds. You’re not really picking any specific winners. You’re just trying to hoping to match the market. And in reality, the market is just kind of keeping up with the growth in M2, the growth in the dollar money supply.

[00:40:08] The second key point that I made that I really liked was diversification limits outperformance. And this also makes intuitive sense to me. It’s right. Like if you’re going to buy a basket of a bunch of different companies and various different industries, you’re probably just going to match the market.

[00:40:25] You’re not going to generate any significant wealth above the market return. And that’s kind of like how investing should be like investing should require that you concentrate capital and risk into a really good idea. And then that’s actually how you’re going to outperform the market. Obviously, that’s extremely difficult to do, and it should be extremely difficult to do but that’s how he thinks about it. And I think how I think about it. So this is a fantastic clip that kind of made me really think about Bitcoin.

[00:40:53] Preston Pysh: Yeah, I agree. It’s a great clip. And just for people, I did a quick, this is using perplexity AI. I was just kind of curious with the 10 year return has been for the NASDAQ and for the S&P 500, just so we can put out the exact numbers here.

[00:41:09] And the S&P 500 has returned annually, 13%. The Nasdaq, VOO is what I used here, or no, I’m sorry. They’re both the s and p five. I put in the wrong ticker. For the Nasdaq, it was showing VOO was 12%, so for the S&P 500 we’re getting between 12 and 13%. If we’re talking about this number that he’s using this eight to 10% of the debasement rate, just so people fully understand what he’s referring to is the M two.

[00:41:35] The money supply growth rate is between, call it eight to 10%. And so what he’s saying is, is if the money supply is growing at this rate and the S& P 500 is giving you something similar, which I would argue there’s about 2 to 4 percent outperformance in the S& P 500 versus if we’re using 8 to 10 percent on the M2 growth rate, you’re barely like getting ahead from a buying power standpoint.

[00:42:00] And I think a really interesting, if people want to run these numbers, go out there and look at your everyday food costs. Let’s just call it, a steak from 10 years ago. Okay. And look at what that price was 10 years ago and maybe pick a basket of things that you’re constantly consuming.

[00:42:17] figure out what the price was 10 years ago, figure out what the price is today, then do a, what’s called a compound annual growth rate on what the price of that basket that you came up with on your own, see what it was. And then compare that to, if you just stored that in the S&P 500, what that same basket would have costed you an S and P or S P Y shares back 10 years ago versus now.

[00:42:39] And when you run this experiment, you’re going to be a little surprised at what you find out because there’s a lot of truth in what Tad is talking about. Let’s go to the next clip. This is of Anthony Pompliano and oh my goodness.

[00:42:54] Help me out here, Joe.

[00:42:56] Joe Burnett: Howard Lutnick.

[00:42:56] Preston Pysh: Howard Lutnick. Thank you. The former CEO, I don’t he’s now the commerce secretary under president Trump. But he was the, former CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald and he’s a hardcore Bitcoiner. So we’re going to go ahead and play this clip, which is very interesting because he’s also going to be the guy that is making the selection of what goes into the new sovereign wealth fund that was just established via executive order last week.

[00:43:22] So we’re going to go ahead and play this clip and here it goes.

[00:43:25] Anthony Pompliano: Like, how do you think about either you or Cantor?

[00:43:28] Howard Lutnick: I don’t have a big enough percentage. I probably have, I can’t say, cause then people can figure out that none and how much I have, I would say I have hundreds of millions of dollars, hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars exposure to Bitcoin and it will be billions.

[00:43:44] Anthony Pompliano: I was going to say, so next year when you come back and we’ll do this again and you’ll be a Bitcoin billionaire.

[00:43:48] Howard Lutnick: And you remember the model I told you. So if every time Bitcoin dips, I’m going to be bought.

[00:43:55] Anthony Pompliano: I know why you’re doing the lending. Listen, listen, you don’t have to explain that one around here.

[00:44:02] Howard Lutnick: I got the 50 percent Bitcoin. I got the Bitcoin lending, but basically. What you’re going to see is can of Fitzgerald is going to be the sponsor of Bitcoin into traditional finance. And so we will be the leader of it. And I’ll pull out this podcast in years to come and say, see, I told you, cause no one’s going to remember, of course, right.

[00:44:19] But all the banks after we do it and show people how to do it, right. They’ll all copy. And so the asset of Bitcoin will just, as it becomes more accepted, it will become more valuable. The whole Bitcoin nation should just call it a commodity, never a currency. Just call it a commodity. Because if it’s a currency, you’re attacking the politicians of the country, right? You’re trying to replace my currency with yours.

[00:44:45] But if you say, hey, hey, hey. I’m just oil. I’m just gold. I’m just a commodity. Leave me be right. Then they’ll leave you be. And that is true. And it will be why Bitcoin, which is rare and is special will become ever more rare as we both know, ever more valuable over time.

[00:45:06] It’ll be financed just like gold is right. Gold is, it’s not like super financeable, but it’s financeable. Oil? It’s not super financeable, but it’s financeable, right? Bitcoin will be financeable. Bitcoin will be way, way, way higher. Sometimes lower. You just have to have faith.

[00:45:24] Preston Pysh: Alright, that is your new Commerce Secretary of the United States talking. So, Joe, take it away.

[00:45:30] Joe Burnett: Yeah, this is a, for our last clip, I think is a really good one. I think Howard Lutnick is probably one of the people that is closest to Trump that has a really good grasp on like the importance of Bitcoin. And why anyone should really be holding it, saving it. Now, obviously, like he said, he has hundreds of millions of dollars personally in Bitcoin, which is obviously a significant amount.

[00:45:52] So I think it’s great that someone close to Trump understands Bitcoin to the degree that Howard Lutnick does. And then also I think when Trump was signing his executive order on the potential US sovereign wealth fund, you had Howard Lutnick standing right next to him. Saying things positively about the U.

[00:46:09] S wealth fund at Bitcoin too. So it’s like the stars are kind of aligning to where if the U. S does really venture into Bitcoin, I feel like Howard will be there saying we need to buy Bitcoin and we need to buy it inside. So I thought it was a great clip.

[00:46:23] Preston Pysh: The part that caught my attention was there at the beginning when they’re talking about why would you get into the borrowing and lending space and they both kind of laughed.

[00:46:31] So if you are a major whale and you want to be able to acquire a lot of coins, in my opinion, one of the best ways for a person to be able to do that is in the borrowing and lending space. Whenever the other party cannot post more collateral and the price moved against them, they’re able to. Soak up those coins and by liquidating them. And I think that’s what, why they were laughing and kind of having that moment there.

[00:46:57] And the reason palm, I have no idea, but this is what I would surmise is the reason Pomp was kind of like, you don’t have to tell me I get it is because of the past experience in the last cycle. But I don’t, I honestly don’t know, but that would be what I would guess.

[00:47:11] So I think this is an important, very, very foot stomp, important note for people. Because these banks are going to be coming into this space in the borrowing and lending in style, they are going to be tripping over themselves to step into this space and that clip, I want this to be etched into people’s brains that the buyer on the other, the person that would end up with coins that get liquidated because of the intense volatility in this is more than happy to soak them up at super low volatile prices.

[00:47:46] Like if Bitcoin rips the 300, 000, then dips the 150 and you get liquidated in a loan, the person who’s collecting those coins, those Bitcoin that you no longer are going to be holding in that scenario, because you didn’t have enough more Bitcoin to post this collateral to keep the loan in place, they are more than happy to collect and retain those Bitcoin at that 50 percent drop.

[00:48:09] And you hear it firsthand from a guy who’s squatting on over a hundred million plus coins that that’s what he fully intends on doing. So don’t forget this clip and don’t forget that the buyer of last resort are people that are ultra high net worth individuals that understand the long term move that this thing’s going to have.

[00:48:29] And their opportunity to soak up a lot of coins are in those moments. So if you’re going to take out a loan against your Bitcoin, first of all, make sure that you understand who your counterparties are and that it’s peer to peer because if it’s tranched with other crap assets, like you’re already in a very precarious situation.

[00:48:46] The other thing that I would tell people is, is if you do take out a loan and you don’t account for a 50, 80 percent drop and what the value of the other Bitcoin that you have to post as additional collateral so that you don’t get liquidated, you might want to do that math. And be prepared for all of this.

[00:49:04] Here’s another thing. If you never want to have to worry about any of that, you just don’t take out a loan against your Bitcoin. So some things to think about. And, you can see the smiles on the faces of people that are very anxious to get their hands on your Bitcoin through borrowing and lending. If you aren’t prepared for what the math might actually bring.

[00:49:26] Joe, any other thoughts?

[00:49:27] Joe Burnett: Yeah, no, it reminded me kind of March, 2020, when Bitcoin wicked down to 3, 000 or so from from 8, 000 in like a matter of days, or at least maybe like one week, it didn’t last there for very long. And part of the reason it was there was because people were using leverage to buy Bitcoin and got wiped out really low. You’re going to use leverage and Bitcoin be extremely conservative. Yes, I think that’s the best way to go about it.

[00:49:52] Preston Pysh: Yeah. And I think that I’m not saying that a person shouldn’t borrow and lend against their Bitcoin. I think that people are way underestimating at what point they should be doing that and what sizing they should be doing that and how much research they need to do on who the counterparty is and who’s introducing that counterparty.

[00:50:12] And like all of these things, it’s the big boys club, right? Like nobody’s going to hold your hand and teach you. You have to teach yourself. You have to do the work and you have to understand the real risks. And I think that’s what I’m trying to impress upon people. Listening is you really need to do your homework and you really need to understand this very deeply before you start playing in the space.

[00:50:33] If you want to keep all your Bitcoin. Joe, this was fantastic. Thank you so much for curating this. Your selection of the clips were incredible. I truly want to do this more often and I would love to do this maybe once a quarter with you or whatever. So really appreciate you taking the time to do this.

[00:50:50] Any final thoughts on any of the clips?

[00:50:52] Joe Burnett: Yeah, no, Preston. Thanks for the invite. Obviously, I’ve been listening to your show for many years, so it was an honor to come on and speak with you. So really enjoyed it. Hope everyone enjoyed the clips and yeah, definitely down to do it again at some point.

[00:51:04] Preston Pysh: Joe, tell people where they can find you.

[00:51:06] Joe Burnett: Yeah, absolutely. So on Twitter, I’m at III Capital watch out for the impersonators there. Also on YouTube, just search Joe Burnett Bitcoin. I should pop up there. And I work at Unchained. So we help people securely hold Bitcoin for generations. And you can learn more about Unchained at unchained.com.

[00:51:25] Preston Pysh: Love it. Thank you so much, Joe. And until next time, thanks for listening. Really enjoyed this.

[00:51:31] Joe Burnett: Awesome.

[00:51:32] Outro: Thank you for listening to TIP. Make sure to follow Bitcoin fundamentals on your favorite podcast app and never miss out on episodes to access our show notes. Transcripts or courses go to theinvestorspodcast.com.

[00:51:47] This show is for entertainment purposes only before making any decision, consult a professional. This show is copyrighted by The Investor’s Podcast Network written permission must be granted before syndication or rebroadcasting.