[00:01:47] Showing how the money supply, the fiat money supply just has to keep being added into the system. And then it follows kind of within a trough. And when it starts going on the bottom rail, they have to add liquidity. When it’s on the top rail, they kind of ease off things. And this is kind of a zoomed in version since COVID of the same chart, but it looks like they basically have been trying to allow the liquidity to not be so aggressive since call it, what was this? Maybe the summer of 2022, it’s gone pretty sideways. Interestingly, from this past summer in 2024, it looks like a lot of liquidity was added into the system.

[00:02:27] I don’t know if that was election based to maybe juice the markets a bit. But what I find interesting is we’ve come off of somewhat aggressively brought the liquidity back down globally since September or October, when the election was finalizing and finishing up. The reason I bring this up is because in the Bitcoin price action, we’ve seen Bitcoin really ramp.

[00:02:52] The election happened and you have a pro crypto us president that he doesn’t care like what it is, a meme coin to Bitcoin. It doesn’t matter for this administration. The price went crazy, but then it’s been very stagnant since. And I see a corollary between how much liquidity has come out of the global economy since that election till now. And I guess my first question for you is. Do you think that that’s a factor of why we’ve seen Bitcoin be stagnant? Or is that a way over simplification of all the different dynamics that make the price bid or contract?

[00:03:28] Matthew Mezinskis: Great question. I have many charts as well that show a very similar story. The monetary base chart basically shows the same story. I could show you some charts in a second, but for the sake of our listeners as well, fine to just talk about it at the beginning.

[00:03:43] The big story obviously was COVID. So from COVID, we had a monetary base that was like 20 trillion. And then it went up to 30 trillion in, scope of a couple of years. Now it’s come down to about 25 trillion. But there are a couple of things that are happening there. First of all, other currencies are getting weaker against the dollar and I know that you talk about that on your show.

[00:04:08] You’ve seen that, especially with the strong pro-business. We talk about politics another time, but pro-business pro Bitcoin, low tax environment that you’re going to see in the U.S. Or presumably going to see in the U.S. Just been massive amounts of massive flights to the dollar for many, many currencies and that was even occurring before Trump was elected, but now it’s just continuing so that’s a big factor.

[00:04:34] And then as far as the global liquidity, which is basically as many people use different terminology there, my global liquidity is the monetary base. It’s the liability side of the central bank balance sheet. Like I said, it’s about 25 and a half trillion at the moment, not only is the dollar getting stronger relative to other currencies, but the central banks themselves all around the world are trying to tighten their belts still and I presume they’re going to do that even for the next quarter or so.

[00:05:02] Inflation is running wild around the world in a lot of different places. You can check the news in many parts of the world and you’ll see that it’s not just war torn countries. We have a lot of overhang still from all the money printing that they did during COVID. So they’re trying to work that out of the system. They’re trying to raise interest rates globally. And the United States balance sheet, even though they have cuts, as we know, the last couple of months, lightly, the balance sheet is still declining overall with the federal reserve. And that is the case for most of the rest of the world as well.

[00:05:35] On my sort of blended average native figure, which is very complicated to calculate on trailing 12 month basis. Central banks have pulled in their balance sheets about 3 percent negative or negative 3 percent growth over the last year, whereas last quarter, you did last quarter that would be flat. but again, it even looks worse than that because those currencies where we have this basket, it’s what can scenes rule or all those currencies are also getting weaker against the dollar.

[00:06:00] So it still is the same dollar milkshake thesis or however you want to talk about it. The dollar still remains the best looking horse in the glue factory, but it is that flight to the dollar is increasing. This is from what I can see.

[00:06:14] Preston Pysh: So on my generic chart that I had up there before, it’s showing that from a trend standpoint, we’re kind of grinding on this lower rail of when they typically step back in and added more liquidity.

[00:06:26] Do you think that we’re kind of getting their ability to kind of press a little lower than where they normally do? Is that because they added so much liquidity through COVID that there’s a lot of excess liquidity still sloshing around to your comment about inflation kind of happening all over the place so that maybe that’s kind of the counterbalance of like why they’re able to contract so much more than what they have historically without having to add more.

[00:06:52] Matthew Mezinskis: I think so. And I can share one now for the YouTube viewers.

[00:06:56] Preston Pysh: Yeah, I want to see what you see.

[00:06:58] Matthew Mezinskis: Yeah. So what you’ll see here, and unfortunately this one, I just, I don’t know why I didn’t get the last three quarters updated by the time this episode airs, we’ll have that 25.5 trillion expressed. But what you see here is we got the monetary based on log scale. So it’s exponential growth, straight line, just a remarkable, let me just take off the bounds, but a remarkable trend in itself. It’s a 99 percent R squared. So wow, the monetary markets move in exponential, the stock markets do the gold markets.

[00:07:25] Everything but Bitcoin actually moves in exponential, which we can talk about. But you can see here, and this is as of September, I got 27 trillion. This is down now to 25 and a half. Okay, I got other charts that will show the 25 and a half. But regardless, we got, we’re going down. And now if I put the bounds on where you can see around this trend line, the lifetime over under on the trend if we go to the two and a half percentile and the 97 and a half percentile, we’re very close to the lower bound. And if I take it out there, you can see there, December 2024, the two and a half percent plus 24 trillion.

[00:07:57] So it’d be like only two and a half percent of the observations will be below that number on or the trend. We’re at 25.5 trillion is the latest figure. So again, by the time this is aired, people will be able to see this on my website, that number, but it is a very strong trend and we are very much at the low end. And if you look back through history before the .com boom and bust before Y2K, we were at a historically low levels, a little bit, the Wall Street crash here in the mid eighties but other than that, the central banks usually pull this trend up, right?

[00:08:28] This is not something that’s fixed. It will go up and down each month, depending on if they’re printing more or less. Usually this trend is being pulled up. every month. And it hasn’t since, like you said, about mid 2022, we’ve gone under that trend.

[00:08:41] So it’s like major, if you looked at this thing now on just straight up linear scale, you’ll see that obviously, we had that big, big crash from mid 2022 central banks have still been printing on balance. Although now, like I said, they’re down about 3 percent negative, but it’s a lot of this as well is dollar strength and other currency weakness. So I can show you here.

[00:09:03] Preston Pysh: So Matthew, on that point, when you’re looking at, and I think the way that the market’s been interpreting these first 30 days of the Trump administration, especially with all the doge news, I don’t think that that’s helped the dollar get weaker relative to all these other currencies. It seems like they’re keeping it at bay, but it just seems like you’re going to have a dollar breakout relative to all these other currencies.

[00:09:24] When you look at the DXY index, I’m curious how they and I say this because just two days ago, now they’re saying they’re going to send out 5,000 checks to all Americans for the savings that Doge has had, which would counterbalance this narrative that the dollar is going to get stronger because they’re going to be more fiscally responsible. They’re going to implement austerity measures and everything else.

[00:09:46] I was always kind of rolling my eyes hearing this. I made a couple of videos like why, but I’m curious your take on the U.S. is current political talk versus what you think is going to happen in reality with the respect of the dollar and the liquidity that they’re going to add into the global economy, because the expectation is that dollar would just get too strong relative to everything else.

[00:10:09] Matthew Mezinskis: Yeah. So just to address that last point, I think big picture, broad strokes, everything stays the same. That means roughly 12. 6 percent per year compounded growth in the global money supply. 12. 6%. It was 12. 7 percent last quarter. Now it’s 12. 6 percent because that’s a very deeply sourced. A lot of numbers go into that weighted average for like the global money supply, the global central bank money supply.

[00:10:38] It was 12. 7 percent actually during COVID. It was up to 13%. It’s a lifetime figure. This black line here on this chart, the solid black line. It was up to 13%, but now it’s down to 12.6 percent per year compounded, but still at the end of the day, that is 1 percent a month, and compounding is, if you do 1 percent a month, you’re actually closer to 13 percent a year, not 12 percent a year.

[00:10:59] So it’s these little things, but the bottom line is we’re still very much in that ballpark, but we are indeed at the lower end of that bound. We’re shrinking liquidity. They’re trying to shrink liquidity. I should say, right. The money masters, the central bankers, and. Globally right now, it’s down to 3 percent decrease natively.

[00:11:19] Actually, if you looked at every native currency, this is something that I try to affect, I try to net out all the dollar changes and just look at, okay, let’s wait. The Euro changes in the Euro, the end, the Yuan, all the different currencies. And it’s decreasing, but it’s not that much. And regardless, if you look at it in dollar terms, it’s the only way we can wait it and sort of globally see it.

[00:11:40] Yeah, it’s on the lower bound, but to your point about the checks or any other sort of stimulus that might come here, I don’t see how they can continue this for much longer now.

[00:11:51] Preston Pysh: The tightening of the liquidity is what you’re saying?

[00:11:53] Matthew Mezinskis: The tightening of liquidity. Yeah. There’s still a lot of narratives, right? There’s still, I think those of us fiscally conservative type folks, who believe that governments shouldn’t overspend, generally are looking at what is happening in Washington as favorable. Of course, there’s, again. But politically, there’s a lot of people want to argue about how they’re doing it and so on and so forth.

[00:12:12] There are a lot of favorable things there. But as we know, the vast majority of the spending here in the U.S. budget is entitlements and it is the military. As John Williams, the old shadow stats economist used to say, you could cut every single program of the United States, except for entitlements, and you would still be in deficit.

[00:12:31] That’s just how it works. And you’d still be running cash flow negative every year. And that’s generally the case. I mean, it’s just a massive proportion, right? I mean, of the 10 trillion that we’re spending now a year, per year, you have two thirds or something like that is entitlements plus military, at least.

[00:12:46] I see that continuing. We could try to take more of a chainsaw approach, not a scalpel approach. It seems like Elon is trying to do that, but even amidst of all the blustering and the yelling in Washington, I think at the end of the day, central banks, the best tool that they have to ease problems in the market is just to print more.

[00:13:05] And they’ll try to use whatever excuse they can do there. And so, yes, it is true. We are at the lower end of that curve, right? We’re not at the two and a half percent, right? That would be about 24 trillion. We’re at 25 and a half trillion globally of central bank money. But I just don’t see that continuing on much longer.

[00:13:22] Preston Pysh: You think by the end of the year, by the end of 2025, you’re going to have, a surge in liquidity.

[00:13:28] Matthew Mezinskis: Yeah, it’s hard to put exact timelines on this, but another thing I would say is, well, to answer your question, I don’t know exactly by the end of the year. I don’t know. But I would say that if you’re looking towards what’s happening in the fiscal government world to how that might affect, say, your Bitcoin portfolio, I would actually tell you that doesn’t matter at all.

[00:13:47] Not at all. As much as people talk about Purchasing power. Like you look at a Bitcoin price chart, this is the chart of people that are worried about their pricing power. And I’m not, I don’t want to change the subject. We can keep it on here, but sort of as a big picture might give comfort to listeners who are bottling Bitcoin.

[00:14:04] I don’t actually see Bitcoin focusing in on any of that. I see what happens to Bitcoin is, if you look at the price curve, you’re looking at the curve of adoption, right? You’ve heard this, you’ve talked to many people about this as an adoption curve. It looks like that it’s a power curve, which we can talk about as well.

[00:14:19] But the growth is so incredible. It’s so again, that those power curves, they run at 96, 97 percent are squared. It’s so resilient that I just don’t see any direct short term connection. With the fiscal environment of the monetary, the fiscal environment, I should say, or the monetary environment of the United States or Europe or Japan, it’s just something that comes and goes month in and month out.

[00:14:44] So from that side, Bitcoin gives you like a tremendous amount of comfort. And so I would say that as far as stocks and bonds, yes, they’re much more reactive to it. Gold as well, gold is interesting. It’s been having a gangbusters year last year and continuing on this year. In the midst of a kind of tightening monetary environment.

[00:15:01] So that’s kind of confusing to people. But again, if I showed you the growth rates of the gold chart, gold would be sort of, I can show you this actually gold would be sort of exponential straight line and Bitcoin would just be flying away at this amazing power curve growth. So the point is Bitcoin still looks like the most superior asset in the world by far, no matter what happens in the sort of short term, what’s going to happen in midterms sort of type decisions. Bitcoin is vastly superior.

[00:15:32] Preston Pysh: Matthew, I want to ask you about this 12.7 figure. So you hear Michael Saylor, you hear myself included and many other people, Lynn Alden constantly saying this 8% growth rate of M2.

[00:15:46] We seem to be way underestimated. And for me, I’ll just look at like the US M2 and I’ll look at it over the past 10 years, I do a compound annual growth rate over that 10 year period, and I’m coming up with a figure around eight to call it 9%.

[00:16:01] How are you arriving at this 12 percent and then I would, I’m curious if, if the number of this 8 percent number is more of a U.S. Centric growth rate of the money supply and the rest of the world is offsetting that by quite a bit or a net of this 12.6 or 12.7 that you’re finding.

[00:16:21] Matthew Mezinskis: Yeah. So for those that are looking on YouTube here, I got a, 65 year chart of the monetary base. I’ve got the numbers here on the left, which monetary base started, with not, I have a sample of 50 currencies. This was like 95 percent of GDP. It’s you’re getting into like a couple billion, maybe 5 billion monetary base size per currency as I add and it just gets too annoying to do it. So it really doesn’t add much.

[00:16:47] The point is that diminishing returns are sort of extreme, but even back in the seventies, if you look at this, you had like a 200 billion monetary base. And then again, that goes to 30 trillion by the peak of COVID early 2022, now down to 25 trillion.

[00:17:03] So, if you want to know how much of the basket, basically, is the U.S., it was more, more than 20 percent back in the 70s and the 80s, but now, with the growth of People’s Bank of China, which is a hugely communist, inflated, distorted balance sheet, the growth of the European Union, together as one currency block, which has happened for the last 20 years, and the amazing staying power of the Japanese Yen, which is a very strong currency relative to the size of the society relative to the agent society and actually told holds its value those four currencies together, the big four.

[00:17:37] They are about 20 percent each of the basket. So just rough numbers you’re getting to 80 percent of the basket with those four currencies and none of them are outsized. It’s kind of like global GDP, actually global GDP over a hundred trillion. The U.S. Is 20 to 25 trillion of that. It’s, it’s actually almost the exact same ratios.

[00:17:57] So that’s also interesting to note. I don’t have my own global sample of M2. you could get that from the IMF, but I haven’t sort of. Done the precise apples to apples with my currencies versus the IMF, because you don’t want to double count and all that stuff, take more currencies than in one basket versus the other, but in any event, and then if you add, say, India, Brazil, Switzerland, Australia, sort of these mid major currencies, Canada, you’re getting already over 90%.

[00:18:24] Okay, but those mid majors. And then the rest, the rest of the basket from there is the last 10%. So that’s the size, that’s the size of how this weighting is, the size of the, of the basket. And to answer your question about where you get this number, I’ll show you here, the 12 month change, right? If I were to, I have a huge spreadsheet, literally, of all the different currencies, of all their growth rates in each individual currency.

[00:18:48] And then I weight that number. By the dollar value of the monetary base in that, but it’s a very, like, I’m not doing it over a period. I’m doing it like every month. If the dollar value changes, the weight will change. So it’s, it’s, it’s pretty detailed from that perspective. But anyway, that number where you’ll finally will settle on globally worldwide long term is 12.6%.

[00:19:08] But obviously, of course, even that number, if you look at a trailing involvement basis, you can be way over it. Right? So here you can see in 2008. Okay. QE one and two in particular stand out where you’re getting 30, 35 percent per year, same thing with QE two. And then of course, COVID. COVID, I think the one of the peaks 32.8 percent per year in February 2021 trailing 12 months.

[00:19:31] So that’s, that gives you a picture of sort of the extremes you will see again, which is wild is from COVID. They knew they realized how much they overshot it all here and the overreaction kind of a symbolism of what happened worldwide anyway, with everything.

[00:19:46] They’ve really tried to cut it back. There’s been literally no money growth or flat money growth in a native trailing 12 month basis. And I don’t go negative on this. You can see it in the tool tip, but really now in the last few months has been like the deepest negative, like negative 3 percent per year.

[00:20:02] December, 2024. Yeah. And that’s a native number, but you look, even if you do it in dollar terms, it’s even more than that. But there’s, there’s two different measurements here. I could give you the dollar, the change in the dollar value, or I can triangulate it first, looking at the actual percentages and then weight those.

[00:20:18] It’s different numbers. We don’t have to go into the weeds of that. But the point is, 12.6 percent is the number of kind of looking at the native unit first. And actually, the dollar growth, as you can imagine, is less. It’s about 10.5%. If you actually just look, I’ll show you if I go back here, say I just did a, the slope of this curve, we’re going to put it up, right?

[00:20:39] So the slope of this curve here, that black line, as it’s a straight line on log scale, it’s clearly exponential growth. The slope of that curve is like somewhere close to 11%, but here I’m actually starting with the dollar values. And you would expect this to even be higher because like back here in the day, in seventies and the eighties, I have less currencies.

[00:20:58] So you would expect that with less currencies. In this old one with, or not old one, but this sort of very scientific one that the 12. 6%, I’m looking at every currency and if there’s one currency that just didn’t exist back in the 70s or something that didn’t exist now, I just don’t like very, very with a fine tooth comb, but here I’m just kind of slapping on a trend line and you would expect that, okay, since I have more currencies later, this is going to grow higher, but it’s actually less, so what does that tell you?

[00:21:27] And it’s about a percent and a half less. The Delta is. So we’re at 12. 6%, something like it’s close to 11 percent that compound growth rate. And what that tells you is central banks, other than the dollar still print a lot of money, and they still can’t keep up because they lose value in the currency versus the dollar, which is just another interesting thing in and of itself.

[00:21:46] The dollar remains always has remained. I don’t see anything that will change that no matter what China or Russia says, it remains the best looking horse in the glue factory, like no matter, no matter what, any way you look at it. So anyway, probably parse through the numbers a little bit too much there, but the point is the growth of the money supply, any way you sliced it is somewhere between 11 percent compounded to 13 percent compounded per year.

[00:22:08] It’s a massive number. It is true though. It is true. If we want to be very rigorous, like, economically about it, we’d have to do Ceteris Paribus. It doesn’t mean that that’s what happens to prices, right? So that’s the supply of the money. If the demand for the money actually went up 13 percent per year, compounded, then prices would not move, but as we know, that doesn’t happen, right?

[00:22:28] So that’s why the demand for that money is not that high and people want to go into gold or Bitcoin or stocks. So, what the actual demand is, no one knows. It’s hard to measure, right? We could measure GDP growth or other things, but it’s probably, you could use population growth, right?

[00:22:42] Population growth is 2 percent per year. That’s a global weighted figure 2 percent per year compounded exponentially money supply grows 13 percent per year. That’s a delta of 11 That’s that might be good enough to show you what you need to do, you get ahead of inflation, right? It’s a very simple sort of way to look at it But that’s one way to look at it world gdp grows a little bit faster than 2 percent per year But it doesn’t grow 13 percent per year.

[00:23:05] Preston Pysh: When I’m looking at this, the thing that really strikes me, if you go back to the other chart there where it had the bars, yes, this one, and I’m looking at the black bars there and you can see how over the last, since COVID really, they’ve been trying to normalize globally as best they could.

[00:23:21] What I find so fascinating is if you look at the equity markets, when it started coming off of that liquidity insertion of COVID, we had equity markets just rip absolutely rip. They adjusted there slightly with the amount of liquidity coming out, but now they’re again at all time highs. And what I personally think it is, and I’m curious if you would agree with this, is we’re finally seeing a rotation out of this long duration bond trade, which worked for 40 years.

[00:23:53] And like, that would be my argument as to why equities are ripping is despite the liquidity that’s being sucked out of the markets globally, just based on the chart that you’re displaying here. I think that the story there is the market has discovered and figured out that that 40 year long bond trade is dead.

[00:24:12] That is a doornail. And as they’re selling out of that, they’re moving into going long equities to try to preserve their buying power. I’m curious if you agree. And if you don’t kind of what your take on that would be of why, how we can see this much liquidity being soaked out of the global economy for the last, call it two years, but yet equity markets are ripping.

[00:24:32] Matthew Mezinskis: No, I 100 percent agree. Nobody wants to be on that side of trade. If bond yields are going to, we’re in a 10, 20 year bear of, of bonds and yields are just going to persistently go up and no matter where you buy on that yield curve, you’re going to look to have to sell that bond at a higher yield, i. e. lower price, two, three, four years after that, no one wants to be a part of that trade. So that’s going to be a huge challenge.

[00:24:54] It’s a huge challenge for any bond investor. And for that reason, equities continue to make sense there. I would still say, though, the bonds are challenging, right? They’re challenging in many ways to sort of value and understand. And certainly when the central bank is becoming as big of a player in the economy as it has been now compared to before, just, I think I showed you this chart. I don’t have it ready offhand, but the central bank is about 20 percent of the U.S. Bond market these days, right?

[00:25:20] So the federal reserves balance sheet, whatever it is, the exact moment, 7 trillion, a little bit under that’s if you look at the actual treasuries divided by the national debt, you’re looking at somewhere around 20 percent a little less of the U.S. national debt.

[00:25:30] It’s a huge layer. People get scared of that. A hundred years ago, the central bank was 0 percent of the national debt. Slowly grew over the last 100 years, and now it’s up to 20%. So people aren’t really quite sure. I think how that’s going to play out. That’s why people look at gold. That’s why people look at Bitcoin. Things don’t look at you politically.

[00:25:49] It’s just hard to be a bond, like to have a lot of conviction as a bond investor, especially during these times. So that, yeah, I think you’re spot on with the way that that tells the story there. But I will say as well with stocks, and this is why I like to look at these trend lines.

[00:26:03] I don’t think I have it ready to pull up, but basically stocks, if you did the long term trend of the S&P 500, just like you do here of the monetary base, right? If you do the S&P 500, so the last 80 years, something like this, it’s the 50s.

[00:26:16] Here I show you global money. It’s like 11%, right? Or, or 12% or 13%, depending on your exact measurement. S&P 500 over the long term is 7% without reinvesting your dividends, 9%. If you reinvest those dividends seven to nine, and it’s even higher in the last 10 years, as it could be like 12%, 30%.

[00:26:33] So that’s just, that’s where people wanna be, I think. I think that’s the trend. I think people are scared to not be there. And if you know that the long-term trend is 7%, and if you reinvest those dividends, you get an extra 2%. It’s just hard to fight that. Right. But then here’s where this beauty of Bitcoin, we bring in Bitcoin, and it’s just this new asset completely different. And we can measure the growth of that. The compound annual growth rate of the Bitcoin curve, the power curve right now at the moment is 45%.

[00:26:59] So we’re running at a, even if you looked at the power curve today, take the power curve next week, you would measure the slope of that curve. It’s about 45%, a little under 45%. At the moment. That’s just massive. And then here’s a really brain twisting question, Preston. I can ask you. So as the slope of this Bitcoin power, let me pull it up actually just to show you.

[00:27:17] Preston Pysh: I love it. Yeah. And that number is just totally berserk.

[00:27:22] Matthew Mezinskis: It is. So, here we have now the Bitcoin price and, I got the old power curve right here.

[00:27:29] Preston Pysh: I like this chart.

[00:27:31] Matthew Mezinskis: Yeah, let’s put it on log scale on the left here. So let’s take the power curve.

[00:27:35] Preston Pysh: So for people listening, he has a chart up that’s showing the compound annual growth rate in discrete, moments in time. And it’s all plotted out and it’s showing kind of like, what is that average trend? It’s he told you it’s 45 percent earlier with a R squared value of 96%.

[00:27:54] Matthew Mezinskis: Yeah, exactly. So even not looking at the trend, anybody can imagine, right? If you bought Bitcoin at 16. In July 2011, you held till today. It’s an 89 percent compound growth. That’s just what it is.

[00:28:05] We can chart it out and what you do is actually, you’ll see that it’s it’s higher in 2010. Of course, when you’re buying for under a dollar, 10 cents and it gets lower, but we do have this phenomenon, the theta, the time dilation that is you get very close things get a little bit wild and kind of want to ignore it.

[00:28:20] We can smooth this out. We can smooth this sort of crazy compound growth curve out by measuring what let’s measure the slope of the trend. So the trend is the black line here. Let’s measure the slope of that. We’re going to get an inverse nice looking black line. So here the trend line just for our listeners, let’s say you bought bitcoin at 6 cents, September 14th, 2010.

[00:28:40] If you’ve actually bought it at 6 cents, that’s 168 percent return. But the trend line would be 20 cents. Just think about trends versus actual. So we bought it that trend. That’s 146 percent compound growth health today. Point is you roll that out. You get till today. And what you’re going to see is we’re right around, yeah, we’re under 45.

[00:29:00] Now we’re at 43 over 43, between 43 and 44 percent compound annual growth. And that’s the slope of the power curve. That’s the slope of the trend. And that’s going to continue out. Even if you go all the way out to the end of the decade, you’re still looking at 35%, 560, 000 Bitcoin price, according to the power curve by the end of the decade.

[00:29:19] But here’s the question, Preston, when do you think that 35 percent compound annual growth rate, or the trend, Will match the stock market of seven and nine, or let’s just say 10%. When do you think 35?

[00:29:32] Preston Pysh: Oh, that’s an interesting question.

[00:29:33] Matthew Mezinskis: It goes down. Yeah. When do you think it will match 10 percent according to the growth of the power curve?

[00:29:39] Preston Pysh: A long time from now.

[00:29:41] Matthew Mezinskis: Good response. That’s a good, you’re on to something. Some people say like maybe only 30 years.

[00:29:45] Preston Pysh: Oh yeah. No, I’m thinking like a hundred years. Based on the math, based on the math.

[00:29:49] Matthew Mezinskis: You’re getting there. Over a hundred years, actually. It’s going to be like somewhere 2050, 20, excuse me, 2150. So, and now I hasten to say, this is not saying I know anybody knows what the return of Bitcoin is going to be in dollar terms, compounded a hundred years from now. I’m just saying. That is the growth of the curve, and clearly, if you look at a lot of other factors in Bitcoin, if you look at the geopolitical world, and if you even look at this magical number, which is 100 trillion USD, which obviously has been made famous in many circles, I think that something will probably happen much sooner in Bitcoin, I think probably in the next 10 years, 20 years.

[00:30:26] Two havings, three havings for other reasons we can discuss, but yes, I have no idea what’s going to happen in a hundred years, but it’s amazing to me. It’s amazing to me that the strength of that curve is still so strong. People like, look at this power curve and like, oh, it’s not exciting. it’s just smooth growth. Who knows that the market’s actually going to work that way? Well. If you actually talk to any financial analysts or hedge fund or pension fund and said, can you consistently deliver 45 percent per year compounded?

[00:30:53] Yes, you’re going to have some huge malox moments every four years with some drawdowns, it’s unstoppable. There is no other trend, bonds, stocks, gold that even comes close.

[00:31:05] Preston Pysh: I want to pull on this thread that you said that you’re saying the math as we’re looking at it here projects that if everything stayed on this power law that it would take that long for it to get down to the same return profile as the S&P 500.

[00:31:17] I don’t think that it’s going to. I think we’re going to see something more like. And some folks might laugh at this, but like the stock, the FOMO, have you ever seen this chart, the stock, the FOMO, where it’s kind of like real aggressive at the start, it’s kind of doing like a 45 percent return profile right now. And then it accelerates again.

[00:31:36] Matthew Mezinskis: Best curve, like an S curve.

[00:31:38] Preston Pysh: Yes. I think that that’s a much more likely scenario as you have nation state adoption, you have corporate adoption, and it starts to really kind of take hold and really start to dominate fiat currencies as a settlement layer where that S curve really starts to pick up.

[00:31:56] I don’t know. Is it five years, 10 years, 15? I have no idea, but I suspect that’s how this actually plays out as opposed to it taking decades and decades. I’m curious and you agree.

[00:32:07] Matthew Mezinskis: There’s a lot of debate and I know, there’s people in the power curve camp and the stock-to-flow camp or stock the FOMO camp, whatever it might be.

[00:32:15] I happened to be in the power curve camp. This Giovanni from Italy, was the first one to observe it. I guess I was the second one according to all the evidence that I’ve seen. Not that I’m, such a big deal to me, but I’m just saying that I’ve been following this, this trend since 2016, sorry, 2018.

[00:32:31] I posted it, but since 2016, the trend has actually been pretty solid. And from everything that I see, I actually think that the power curve based on Bitcoin’s price and market cap fundamentals is the strongest trend that we have. And I think that actually could continue on for a long time. And I don’t necessarily see that FOMO.

[00:32:50] I could be wrong. I’ll show you a couple of the charts, but there’s a way to explain this without like using too many statistical, terms and all this stuff. And I’m not a statistician, sort of a applied statistician, sort of numbers guy, but we just talked a bunch about exponential curves, right?

[00:33:05] We talked about the monetary base, talked about bond markets, obviously is exponential. Any interest rate you hear is exponential. If it’s quoted as an interest rate, that’s an exponential market. The stock market, 7, 9 percent per year, population growth, GDP, these are all exponential things.

[00:33:18] It seems to me that if you look at networks, things where you have this relationship of, say, few large nodes with many people connecting, or servers, you can use the word nodes, server, client, whatever, client server, or you have the situation where you have many small nodes with few connecting, which that’s a power law relationship.

[00:33:41] This sort of network effect type growth, it seems more likely to me to actually continue. So another example would be the growth. And there’s a book it’s written by a guy named Jeffrey West. Giovanni has actually talked about this book as well. Like it’s called Scale. It’s a very good book, but my understanding of the way that power curves grow, it’s also the way that cities grow.

[00:34:01] So even though exponentially the world is growing exponentially one to two percent per year compounded consistently. Cities actually grow different. Even though we’re putting, it seems like tons of people into cities every year. They don’t just like fly into the sun and it’s not that the growth of them is slowing down.

[00:34:17] Just the growth of them is occurring in this sort of structured, interesting network way where you have infrastructure that’s just totally different than out outside, right? Not as many people need a car. People can live on top of each other. Utilities can be delivered in a certain way in a city that they couldn’t be delivered in the countryside or in a suburb or so on and so forth.

[00:34:35] And that is actually, if you research the growth of cities, they grow in this sort of power curve way. It’s sort of this gradual, gradual way that if you look at it on log scale, it’s actually not a straight line. It’s a decreasing line. And this is what you see with Bitcoin.

[00:34:50] Let me show you now. So that’s my attempt at least to try to not use fancy statistical terms to say why I think power could work for Bitcoin. But here, let me put this now, this is the Bitcoin power trend versus the exponential trend. I got this on log scale and just take this off.

[00:35:04] Number one is the power trend. Number two is, is an exponential trend for Bitcoin. They’re the same trends. Like I’m using the same amount of data. It’s all the all time data of Bitcoin as of when I pulled it into the model, which should be today, February 20th.

[00:35:16] As of our recording, 97,000 Bitcoin, 97 and a half thousand dollars. Bitcoin is the price right on power trend. By the way, power trend is about 93,000 Bitcoin. Look at the exponential price. If Bitcoin followed exponential, it is 392,000. Only 86 percent are squared. These are the exact same math is applied here.

[00:35:36] I’m just using the exponential formula for the exponential trend or a power formula for the power trend. Bitcoin just does not look exponential to me. If you take off the power, you have this, you’re just looking at the exponential line. Now, straight line on log scale, that’s how exponential growth works.

[00:35:50] Just doesn’t, you can see it just doesn’t fit the price growth. You got way under it, obviously, in the 2010s. And then, even from this peak in 2013 through that crypto winter 2017, you don’t even go under trend. Until finally 2022 ironic date we already discussed and then we’ve been under trend since 2022.

[00:36:09] If Bitcoin followed an exponential curve, I think it would have a better R squared. I think it would have an R squared that’s closer to 100 or not. I should say power is not exactly 100, but it’s 96%. It’s pretty good. It doesn’t have to be 100%. By the way, like gold is an exponential trend in the R squared might be. 87%. I don’t know.

[00:36:27] It’s still exponential, but the best trend that fits it is exponential, if that makes any sense. And that’s only 87 percent are squared. That’s the gold market. So Bitcoin, I see what I see when I see with Bitcoin. I don’t see like the stock market. I don’t see what Trump is going to say.

[00:36:43] The next week, I don’t see what the Fed is doing. I’m more see an adoption curve, people around the world plugging in people learning about the lightning network people to braise one small geopolitical trend that I’m living through here in Eastern Europe in the Baltics.

[00:36:57] It’s pretty scary time for us right now with what’s happening in Ukraine and uncertainty how that war is going to be resolved. The Baltics, we are next on the chopping block for Eastern Europe. Like we’re NATO countries since 2004 but people are wondering if NATO will even be honored at some point. That is actually a concern. I think the probability is still low, but it’s a question mark. But I am thankful that I have Bitcoin, even living in Europe and living in Eastern Europe, that if I need to take my family and move like Bitcoin and multi sig, I don’t need to do anything. I don’t need to send it anywhere.

[00:37:26] You can literally just move. Have it in multiple jurisdictions, backed up redundant. It’s I say this every time I get on a Bitcoin pod as a guest, but it literally is a superpower to do Bitcoin multisig. It’s unbelievable. It’s something like we’ve never seen. So I don’t, I just don’t look at Bitcoin as sort of something that responds to the whims of central bank. I look at it more as a network being adopted.

[00:37:49] You know a lot of people haven’t figured out the glories of multi sig or whatever there’s so many things that amazing features will taproot. I think it’s gonna take a long time I think you can FOMO into it, but Even something like FOMOing into Facebook or Amazon, like, yeah, there’s huge growth and it’s exponential growth, but it still takes a long time and it’s usually not a strong growth rate, right?

[00:38:07] These other markets, we can talk about social networks, whatever, the Winklevii, that, that whole story with them and Zuckerberg that happened in 2003. Yeah, Zuckerberg is one of the richest people in the world now and Facebook’s a hugely successful top 10 stock, but this is 20 years on. There’s a few unicorns.

[00:38:23] Bitcoin is in my view, it’s not going to be any, any more or less explosive, let’s say. I think it’s still going to be whether actually you’re, this is another point to say, by the way, whether you’re exponential growth or whether your power growth is still going to take a long term. I just don’t see it to use my analogy.

[00:38:38] I don’t see anything sort of exploding into the sun in the next few years. I think it’s just take a long time. A lot of different people around the world have to come to grips with it. And even when they do, Are they really going to use multi sig? Are they really going to plug into the Bitcoin network the right way?

[00:38:51] Are they just going to FOMO in on an ETF and then I don’t know buy a pay off their car payment or something, for the average person. I’m not saying I’m not trying to belittle anyone, but that’s my view.

[00:39:02] Preston Pysh: Here’s a question I got for you on the power law at what price would it start looking like that’s being, let’s say we see a million dollar Bitcoin in the coming two years.

[00:39:12] I know that that wouldn’t violate or make the power law invalid, but it would start to suggest that maybe a price action, because I think the upper rail of this power laws is around like four or 500,000. Is that correct?

[00:39:27] Matthew Mezinskis: Yeah, that’s about right. It’s a top end, probably four or 500. Yeah, that’s probably right. That’s very rare. Technically you could get up to 700,000 probably in some 99th percentile charts, but yeah, probably 400, 500,000 in my view would be a more accurate blow off. \

[00:39:42] Preston Pysh: So if we would get to call it a million or a million five or something like that, within two years, that would be an indicator that hold on because maybe there’s no model that can actually describe this was, is that an accurate way to look at it or help us understand mathematically? Like what is inside or outside those limits and what would almost be like a flag that’s raised is like, ‘Hey, you might want to pay attention to this cause something’s different’

[00:40:07] Matthew Mezinskis: Yeah. Or even within the next year. Right. So if we’re talking, if we’re talking to say realistically or in the top percentile bands. There’s something like 300, 400,000 within the next year. And as everybody knows in Bitcoin land, 2025 is, theoretically that’s the, December, 2025 that’s the end of the four year cycle, which has typically been a blow off top.

[00:40:29] I would certainly say we should look harder at other ways to talk about Bitcoin. If it goes up above a million by the end of this year, that would be very interesting. And by the way, that’s why it’s awesome. Even the numbers we’re talking about, like, could you imagine if like, we’re just, some of the things statisticians argue about here, we’re talking about whether Bitcoin might go up to three or 400,000 versus a million and if it’s going to invalidate some model or not.

[00:40:55] So by the way, I am, I would certainly not be disappointed if it did that. But yeah, just as an example here, right on trend for the exponential by the end of the year for the exponential, 773,000, that’s by the end of this year, whereas the power, as you see,

[00:41:13] Preston Pysh: Oh, that’s interesting.

[00:41:13] Matthew Mezinskis: Yeah. Same chart end of 2025 for the power only about 123,000. To get to something like three sigma or 99 percentile. This is not how you do sigmas, but let’s just very simply say if you multiply the Bitcoin trend line by three, that’s like the most rare thing that could happen.

[00:41:31] So that’s already, you’re at, 375,000, something like that. That’s not what three sigma means, just to be clear. I’m not saying that, but there’s no way, like it’s extremely rare for the model to be 3X the trend by the end of this year. That’s an extremely rare number. Whereas that number, 3X the trend of the power trend, 375,000, that’s like half of what an exponential trend would put us at.

[00:41:53] So yeah, I do think actually we’re going to get a probably a more definitive answer to this. In the next two halvings, I think sure that I mean, that’s that might sound too, too long to you, but search a lot of people. I still think we’re gonna have to wait another having to see exactly how this is playing out.

[00:42:10] Let’s just say if Bitcoin goes to a million by the end of this year, that would break most of the parallel models. Yeah, parallel idea of what Bitcoin is. And I say that not as sort of a embracing one model or the other, just saying that to me. What you see when you see Bitcoin’s price action is really not a reaction of any one politician. I do see it more as like a network, network adoption. That’s where I’m sort of the comfort of these models. I’m getting it. It’s not, it doesn’t have anything to do with externalities to Bitcoin.

[00:42:42] Preston Pysh: What are your thoughts on the having playing a role moving forward? ‘Cause it seems like it was a very powerful force early on. There’s a lot of people making arguments that we’re kind of beyond the having really having much of an impact.

[00:42:56] I know Willie Wu has been kind of saying that for quite a while, and there’s many others that I think agree with him. What are your thoughts on the impact of the having moving forward?

[00:43:05] Matthew Mezinskis: I think that they’re going to have a proportional effect on the Bitcoin price, just as the price has tended to grow in power. What do I mean by that? Let me show, this is my website. I got a power curve on my website. If people wanna see, they can play around with the bands and everything. And by the way, on my website, we can just see here, by the end of 2025, I got a 97.5 percentile per my, there’s a lot of people who do different analysis.

[00:43:32] Mine says 455, 450,000, right? So that’s just again, really, in my opinion, pretty rare in the end, 2025. I’m gonna show this chart and I’ll answer the question about how important I think havings are.

[00:43:44] What is a power law or a power curve mean? Power curve means proportional growth relative to the size of the network, but it does not mean constant growth. So everything we just talked about at the beginning of the show, base money, the Fiat money supply grows at 11 to 13 percent per year compounded. That’s a fixed number, constant number. We can run doubling times from that, like 10%, for example, that’s the basic one does not double in 10 years, right? With compounding rule of 72, it doubles in 7.2 years.

[00:44:12] So that is the like most simple way to talk about exponential growth is because of the compounding feature of exponential growth. We get something that will double faster than what it might seem like, right? With the 10 percent example, an investment will not double in 10 years under 10 percent compound growth. It will double in 7.2 years. That’s how you can figure out doubling time. And that’s a constant thing. It doesn’t matter which percentage you pick for something else, 9%, 15%.

[00:44:37] These doubling times are the same for each investment or being in nature that’s growing at that rate. And the percentages are the same. They’re constant with power. It’s different with power. You get that sloping curve on log scale. But you do get a fixed percent of whatever your x axis is. That’s what power is. So if you see here on this chart, I have it on my website and people can see it’s actually a familiar number, but it’s unrelated.

[00:45:03] It’s just a coincidence. It’s about 12.7%. But again, this is not 12.7% per year. This is what this shows is what the power curve, if we measure the rate of growth of the power curve of Bitcoin. It’s a declining growth rate. So remember it was over 100 percent 10 years ago. Now it’s 45%, a little bit under 45 percent per year.

[00:45:21] But what is fixed or what is proportional is the extra amount of days. If we can find a certain percentage based on the math, an extra amount of days in time, that will always be the same for the price to double or pick a number, the price to go up five, something like this.

[00:45:37] So I just, as an example, I picked up the doubling percentage and it happens to be about 12.7%. That’s 1.7 percent per year. It is for every increase in the amount of days of the Bitcoin network. That is 12.7%. Bitcoin’s price doubles. That’s the trend. So you can see here when Bitcoin is really young 2010, there’s only 640 days. 12.7 percent is just a new 72 days. You add 72 days on 640, you get to 722. The trend just went from 25 cents to 50 cents.

[00:46:04] It only took 72 days, but now where we are in between this on my little chart here, it’s again, you could pick any days you could pick any days to run. This would always do the same 12. 7%. We’re between here, this 2024 2026 number, a 12.7 percent increase in the life of Bitcoin as a network is 625 days.

[00:46:23] So for the model, you need it to double that trend line. You need to now have a lot more days. And that’s just how, that’s how this example of Bitcoin’s power curve work. ‘Cause you can do power curve on the hash rate or on address growth or all these other things. But the simple interesting thing is the dollar price on time, dollar price versus days.

[00:46:41] And you get this proportional growth of Bitcoin, the network, for every 12 to 13 percent increase in time of the network. The adoption seems to double. That’s my, that’s my interpretation of the power curve.

[00:46:56] Preston Pysh: On the hash rate. Are you able to do a power law on the hash rate or is it exponential?

[00:47:01] Matthew Mezinskis: Yup. It is a power law as well. Power on addresses. It’s a power on addresses. It’s power on hash rate.

[00:47:07] Preston Pysh: Wow. That’s interesting.

[00:47:09] Matthew Mezinskis: Yeah. So with that in mind, if someone would ask me about the having, which is a declining exponential function. This is where Bitcoin gets confusing, and it confuses a lot of people or at least, again, I’m not saying I haven’t figured it out, but the math of it.

[00:47:22] If you look at the 50 Bitcoins every 4 years going out at 25, going out at 12 and a half, which is all part of the stock-to-flow to, by the way, and also, a lot of other models. That is a declining exponential curve.

[00:47:33] It’s about 16 percent per year, I think, is the declining to cut the emission rate of Bitcoins. Half in half every four years, you’re cutting it at an exponential halving of 16 percent per year. So what you have with Bitcoin is interesting. Unlike gold, where ounces of the ground come out at 1.8 percent per year, silver is actually less, weirdly, 1.5%, but stock market, all these things, whether you look at price, supply, demand, everything seems to be exponential.

[00:48:01] With Bitcoin, you have a myriad of things. You have declining exponential on the emission. If you looked at the supply curve itself, that means Bitcoin is not market cap. It’s logarithmic. And if you look at the supply curve in dollars, it’s in power.

[00:48:16] You have three different curves in Bitcoin, whereas everything else in the world is exponential and Bitcoin, you have three different curves. I’m going to go deeper with that. Again, I’m not trying to confuse the picture, but there are a lot of ways to play with those numbers.

[00:48:28] That’s why I think it’s exciting. Like there’s a lot of different, you got physicists now looking at this. You got a lot of people trying to understand this is a real living network before our eyes, like a monetary system. So it’s incredible to put all these numbers. That’s a long winded way, Preston, of answering your question.

[00:48:44] I don’t necessarily think one way or another about the having. I think that. For every 12.7 percent increase in days in the life of Bitcoin, I think the adoption doubles. I think the price doubles.

[00:48:55] Preston Pysh: I mean, if you’re a math student and listening to this, you have to be just like a pig in mud with your curiosity should be taking you in a whole bunch of different directions to research further. But Matthew, unfortunately I have to end the conversation because I’ve actually got to run somewhere.

[00:49:11] This is fascinating. I could talk to you all day. I love this. And you’re somebody in the space who deeply understands the mathematics in so many different directions and I just love the models that you do with respect to liquidity. And it’s just such a pleasure to talk to you every time. And so thank you so much for making time and coming on the show today and talking this, we definitely have to do it again in the future, but thanks so much.

[00:49:37] Matthew Mezinskis: My pleasure, Preston. Thanks for having me on. Look forward to the next one.

[00:49:39] Preston Pysh: Yeah. And give people a quick handoff of where they can do more research or dig into some of the stuff that you’ve been talking about.

[00:49:45] Matthew Mezinskis: Yep. My handle on all the socials Nostr included is 1basemoney. The number one base money. So you can find me there.

[00:49:52] Also, my website is https://www.porkopolis.io/ or cryptovoices.com. That’s the podcast.

[00:49:57] Preston Pysh: Awesome. Okay. We’ll have links to all that in the show notes, Matthew.

[00:50:00] Thank you so much. And we’ll see you guys next week.

[00:50:03] Outro: Thank you for listening to TIP. Make sure to follow Bitcoin Fundamentals on your favorite podcast app, and never miss out on episodes to access our show notes, transcripts, or courses, go to theinvestorspodcast.com.

[00:50:19] This show is for entertainment purposes only before making any decision, consult a professional. This show is copyrighted by The Investor’s Podcast Network. Written permission must be granted before syndication or rebroadcasting.